
Disputed signatures on contracts: what happens when a signature is challenged?
At Tees, we advise businesses and individuals involved in disputes about whether a signature on a contract or other legal
Our specialist team advises officeholders, creditors, directors, banks and other third parties.
Insolvency does not only give rise to claims against directors. Various third parties can all find themselves involved in claims connected to a company’s insolvency, from validating transactions made after a winding-up petition, to unwinding preference payments transactions at an undervalue made before it. Our Insolvency and Corporate Restructuring team advises on the full range of these claims, acting for officeholders, creditors, directors, banks and other third parties.
Once a company enters, or is heading towards, formal insolvency, certain transactions and dealings involving that company can be challenged, even where the other party was not a director. These claims exist to preserve the company’s assets for the benefit of its creditors, to ensure the company’s assets are distributed fairly and in accordance with the order of priority, and to unwind transactions that unfairly disadvantaged them.
Third parties who may become involved include banks and other lenders, suppliers, connected companies, individual creditors and anyone who received payments, transfers of any asset or a benefit from the company in the period leading up to its insolvency.
Once a winding-up petition has been presented, section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that any disposition of the company’s property made after that point is void, unless the court orders otherwise.
This can catch ordinary trading activity, such as payments into and out of a company’s bank account, as well as one-off transactions. Where a company needs to continue operating, or a third-party needs certainty that a payment or transfer will not later be unwound, an application can be made to the court for a validation order to permit the disposition.
Sections 236 and 237 of the Insolvency Act 1986 give liquidators and administrators powerful tools to investigate a company’s affairs. An officeholder can apply to court for an order requiring a person, which may include a director, employee, professional adviser, bank or other third party, to:
These applications are often used where an officeholder suspects assets have been hidden, dissipated or transferred, or where information needed to pursue a recovery is being withheld.
We advise officeholders on when and how to use these powers and we advise third parties, including banks, accountants and other professionals, who face a section 236 or 237 application.
Certain transactions entered into by a company before its insolvency can be reviewed and in some cases reversed by the court. These are commonly known as reviewable transactions and include:
These claims can involve directors, but frequently involve third parties, including lenders, connected companies, business partners and individuals who received a payment or benefit from the company.
We provide tailored advice on insolvency claims involving third parties, including:
Our approach is commercial, robust and objective-focused, with a clear emphasis on achieving pragmatic outcomes in complex insolvency disputes.
Whether you are an officeholder pursuing a claim against a third party, or a third party facing a claim arising from a company’s insolvency, our team can provide clear, practical advice on your position, potential liabilities and the options available to you.
We have offices across Cambridgeshire, Essex and Hertfordshire, but we can help you wherever you are in England and Wales.
Please complete this form and one of our team will be in touch with you shortly.
Alternatively, you can call us now.
Fill in the form below and one of our team will get back to you.
By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy and consent to being contacted about your enquiry. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
“Ana James-Pittau is one to watch – she is calm under pressure, astute, and across the details of a case and beloved by clients. Her legal knowledge is impeccable and achieves fantastic results for clients: diligent, robust, and commercially minded – she is highly respected by her peers. She is quick to adapt to a changing factual landscape and ensures that clients are always offered fantastic service and the best route to achieve their aims.”
“The partner responsible for managing our work (David Perry) always makes himself available to discuss matters when we require him, and we have every confidence in his ability to think his way around any problem.”
“Very competent and professional. Explained things clearly and gave sound advice and recommendations. Strong communication – responsive and timely.”

At Tees, we advise businesses and individuals involved in disputes about whether a signature on a contract or other legal

Unfortunately, disputes between neighbours over trees often arise. Whilst trees can enhance the appearance of a property, they can also

The law regulating the use and ownership of firearms has tightened considerably over the past ten years, following a serious

The iconic Stefano Gabbana has stepped down as chair of Dolce & Gabbana in the last few days. Whilst this
All businesses consider restructuring at some point. Whether they want to streamline, prepare for sale, merger or de-merger, change their financial structure, refinance or saving costs.
Unpaid debts and contractual disputes can affect your business. Our litigation lawyers will help you solve them quickly and effectively.
When you need to raise funds for your business, our legal experts will guide you through finding and implementing the best options.
Our regulatory team are expert in advising on the rules that apply to you and your organisation.
–
–
–
–