Tees’ expertise resolves complicated divorce financial settlement

Underlying issues resurface to make for a complex financial case between a husband and his ex-wife.

For context:

Tees were instructed to represent Benjamin* in concluding a financial settlement with his ex-wife following their divorce. Prior to Benjamin becoming a client of Tees, he had sought legal advice elsewhere to represent him whilst going through their divorce.

It had come to light that even though their divorce was settled, the financial issues remained unresolved. Influential factors in the time that passed between the divorce and Benjamin’s legal representation from Tees are where the case faces complexities.

Throughout Benjamin’s marriage with his ex-wife, he was a stakeholder at a successful company within the motor industry. Following on from the divorce, he had since sold his shares but remained an employee, therefore earning additional shares which had vested prior to a nine-figure sale.

What happened next:

As Benjamin and his ex-wife had not reached a financial settlement at the time of divorce, it then became a question of her entitlement to the following:

  • the initial shares, and
  • any future shares.

This was complicated by the associated risk of a potential future tax liability on the shares.

With this in mind, the parties engaged in negotiations to achieve a financial settlement, in the region of a significant seven figure sum.

A multi-disciplinary service:

Financial settlement aside, Tees identified complicated inheritance and tax issues which could become expensive for Benjamin. Pulling in expertise from other areas of the business, Benjamin was provided with the correct tax and associated legal advice.

A detailed scheme was set up to protect the husband on future tax issues, contained in the financial consent order and a related Deed of Indemnity.

This case, valued at approximately £20 million, is a strong reflection of the exceptional quality at Tees. We are proud to offer our clients a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary service, drawing on expertise from a wide range of specialisms.

If you’re unsure of what to do next after a separation, our experts are here to guide you through the process.

Tees’ expertise resolves complicated divorce financial settlement

Complex financial case arises after divorce settlement: How tees helped one client navigate post-separation finances
Background

Tees was instructed to represent Benjamin* in reaching a financial settlement with his ex-wife following their divorce. Before approaching Tees, Benjamin had sought legal advice from a different firm during the divorce proceedings.

Although the divorce itself had been finalised, the financial matters between the former spouses remained unresolved. The time that had passed since their separation—and the changes in Benjamin’s financial circumstances—contributed to the complexity of the case.

The challenge

During the marriage, Benjamin was a stakeholder in a successful motor industry company. After the divorce, he sold his shares but remained employed by the company. As a result, he acquired additional shares, which vested prior to a significant nine-figure sale of the business.

Because no financial settlement had been agreed at the time of the divorce, the key legal question became whether Benjamin’s ex-wife was entitled to:

  • The original shares held during the marriage, and

  • Any of the shares acquired post-divorce.

Further complicating matters was the risk of a substantial future tax liability associated with these shares.

Navigating the settlement

With these factors in mind, both parties entered into negotiations. The goal was to reach a financial settlement, which ultimately was agreed in the region of a significant seven-figure sum.

A multi-disciplinary approach

In addition to the financial negotiations, Tees identified complex inheritance and tax issues that could have significant financial consequences for Benjamin. Drawing on the firm’s in-house expertise, Benjamin received tailored advice covering both tax and legal aspects of his situation.

To protect him from future tax exposure, Tees developed a comprehensive scheme, which was incorporated into both a financial consent order and a related Deed of Indemnity.

The outcome

This case—valued at approximately £20 million—highlights the value of Tees’ multi-disciplinary approach. We are proud to provide clients with holistic legal services, drawing on expertise across family law, tax, and estate planning to ensure the best possible outcome.

If you’re uncertain about your next steps following a separation, our team is here to guide you through every stage of the process.

*Names have been changed to protect client confidentiality.

Divorce settlements and private school fees: Ensuring your child’s future

Divorcing parents often face difficult decisions regarding their child’s education, particularly when it comes to private school fees. With rising tuition costs and changes to VAT exemptions for independent schools, many parents are increasingly concerned about ensuring their child can continue at their school or university of choice following divorce. Securing school fees in a divorce settlement is becoming a pressing issue for many families, especially when friendships and social lives are intertwined with a child’s school community. At Tees, we are committed to helping families find the best path forward.

Our expertise in divorce settlements and school fees

In divorce settlements, one of the key challenges is addressing private school fees. The Court prioritises basic needs, and school fees are often seen as a luxury once those needs are met. As a result, it can be difficult for parents to secure a guarantee for school fees as part of their divorce settlement.

Clare Pilsworth, Partner at Tees Cambridge, explains: “The Court does not prioritise school fees and considers them an individual decision after housing expenses have been accounted for.”

However, the Court will assess the “needs” of each family differently based on individual circumstances. In some cases, the Court has criticised parents who do not continue paying school fees when they could afford to do so: “What children need is love and time. Actually, like everyone else, they also need money.” (K v D (2015), para 20).

Even if financial circumstances change significantly after a divorce, the Court may still approve orders for school fees, though both parents may have to make sacrifices (WD v HD (2015), para 56).

Financial remedy consent orders for school fees

In many cases, divorce settlements are reached without a Final Hearing, resulting in a Financial Remedy Order. This is an agreement between the divorcing parties, approved by a Judge, outlining how assets should be divided. If both parties agree, the arrangement can be formalised, allowing the child to continue attending their school. If an agreement proves difficult, various non-court dispute resolution methods can help reach a mutually beneficial solution.

Modifying a current order

If you already have a divorce settlement in place but are struggling to pay school fees due to a change in circumstances, you can apply to the Court to vary the existing Order. If this is a concern, please contact us for expert advice.

Steps you can take now

While a final divorce settlement may take time, there are steps you can take to support your child’s education during this period:

  1. Inform the School: Keep the school or university informed of any changes in your financial situation. If your ex-partner historically paid the fees, request that invoices be sent directly to them moving forward.

  2. Consider a Maintenance Pending Suit Application: If your partner refuses to pay the fees, a maintenance pending suit application could order them to pay the school fees until the settlement is finalised.

  3. Explore Fee Reductions or Postponements: If both parents are unable to cover school fees, speak to the school’s bursar about possible reductions or postponements.

  4. Consider Alternative Schools: If fees become unaffordable, consider alternative schools. Notify the school early to avoid being liable for fees for the next term.

  5. Seek Expert Advice: At Tees, we assist many parents in ensuring that school fees are included in their divorce settlements. Our expert team is here to guide you through this process.

Divorce can be a challenging time, but with the right legal guidance, you can secure the best possible future for your child’s education. Contact Tees for expert support in navigating this important aspect of your divorce settlement.

N.B. The standard 20% VAT rate was added to private school fees from 1 January 2025. Any fees paid from 29 July 2024 relating to the term starting in January 2025 and onwards was be subject to VAT. Gov.uk- education hub

Divorce financial settlements: Your comprehensive guide

Navigating the financial aspects of a divorce can be overwhelming. One of the most important steps is reaching a fair financial settlement, ensuring both parties can move forward independently. While every divorce is unique, this guide outlines how settlements are typically decided, the factors that influence them, and how you can protect your financial future.

What is a divorce financial settlement?

A divorce financial settlement is an agreement between you and your spouse on how to divide your assets, debts, and finances after separation. Once approved by a court through a consent order, it becomes legally binding, preventing future claims.

How to achieve a fair financial dettlement

Step 1: List and value your assets

Create a comprehensive list of all your assets and debts. This may include:

  • Property: Family homes, rental properties, and vacation homes
  • Savings and investments: Bank accounts, pensions, stocks, and shares
  • Personal belongings: Vehicles, jewelry, and artwork
  • Business interests: Companies, partnerships, or self-employment assets
  • Debts: Mortgages, loans, credit card balances
Step 2: Consider mediation or legal assistance

For amicable divorces, mediation can help you negotiate directly. For more complex cases, hiring an experienced divorce solicitor can ensure your interests are protected. Courts are typically a last resort when agreements cannot be reached.

Factors influencing asset division

Courts aim for a fair division of assets, but this does not always mean a 50/50 split. Key factors include:

  • Children’s needs: The welfare of any children is a top priority.
  • Length of marriage: Longer marriages often lead to more equal divisions.
  • Income and earning capacity: Future earning potential may be considered.
  • Health and age: Medical conditions may influence financial support needs.
  • Standard of living: Courts may seek to maintain a similar standard of living.
Understanding matrimonial vs. non-matrimonial assets
  • Matrimonial assets: Acquired during the marriage or through joint efforts (e.g., family homes, pensions, joint savings).
  • Non-matrimonial assets: Usually acquired before or after marriage or through inheritance. These may be excluded from the settlement unless required to meet needs.
Addressing common questions

1.Will my partner receive half of my assets?

Not necessarily. Courts aim for fairness, which may involve unequal divisions depending on needs, contributions, and other circumstances.

2.What happens to my pension?

Pensions are often included in settlements through a Pension Sharing Order, giving one spouse a percentage of the other’s pension.

3. Who is responsible for debts?

Debts incurred during the marriage are generally shared. However, personal debts may remain the responsibility of the individual.

4. What if my partner hides assets?

If asset concealment is suspected, courts can investigate and impose penalties. A financial expert can assist in uncovering hidden funds.

5. Is my inheritance at risk?

Inheritances are often excluded from settlements, especially if received post-separation. However, they may be considered if needed to meet financial obligations.

Finalising your divorce settlement

Once you reach an agreement, a solicitor can draft a Consent Order to submit to the court for approval. This legally binding document ensures financial closure.

If agreement cannot be reached, the court will make a ruling based on the specific circumstances of your case.

Need expert legal support?

Navigating financial settlements can be complex. Seeking guidance from our experienced divorce solicitor can provide clarity and ensure your interests are protected. Contact us today for a confidential consultation.

Resolving high-income divorce challenges and future income concerns

The division of assets is one of the main issues to resolve during divorce proceedings. For people with very high incomes and substantial assets, and their spouses, being able to reach a fair financial settlement is, understandably, a key concern, given the number of potentially complicating factors and levels of income that need to be taken into account.

Decisions as to what happens to future income is often where there is most difficulty in reaching an agreement in a divorce settlement involving a high-earning spouse.  This is particularly so where complex reward structures are involved that are not fully understood by one if not both spouses.

Failure to fully take into account incentive and performance reward packages can have significant implications on the outcome of a divorce settlement and risk restricting either party’s choices in the future, so you must seek specialist legal advice.

Incentive payments and performance payments not yet realised

There may be circumstances where there are financial resources in place through incentive and performance reward packages which originated during the marriage, although they are not immediately available at the time of the divorce settlement.

Such financial resources may well be shared in a divorce to achieve fairness between the earning and non-earning spouse.

Incentive and performance reward packages are aimed at attracting and retaining the best talent and are likely to be nuanced from firm to firm and industry to industry. However, enhanced remuneration structures do tend to follow certain themes, such as:

Share options (or stock options)

Share option schemes are typically used as an incentive for employees. A share option is the right to buy a certain number of company shares at a fixed price at some point in the future.  Share option schemes often come with tax incentives.

There are different share option schemes you may come across such as Company Share Option Plans, Enterprise Management Incentives, Nil-Cost and Nominal Costs Options, Share (Stock) Appreciation Rights, Sharesave Share Option Schemes and ‘Phantom’ Options.

Long-term incentive plans

A long-term incentive plan (LTIP) is a term that is commonly used among listed companies to describe executive share plans under which a company makes share-based awards to senior employees with a vesting period of at least three years.  Such structures are also often called ‘performance shares’ or, in the US, ‘restricted stock units’.

Again there are often tax efficiencies to these schemes.  LTIPs are not restricted to rewards in shares; cash also features in these reward structures.

Management incentive plans

A management incentive plan (MIP) most often refers to a scheme where the equity is allocated to senior management in a privately owned business.  The company is likely to be owned by a private equity house and the equity would vest with the senior management in the event the private equity house sells its share the business or the company is floated on the stock market.

Performance bonuses

A form of additional compensation paid to an employee or department as a reward for achieving specific goals or hitting predetermined targets. A performance bonus is compensation beyond normal wages and is typically awarded after a performance appraisal and analysis of projects completed and/or financial targets met by the employee over a specific period.

Sharing of payments – what to consider?

There is a distinction to be made between those sums payable under such incentive or performance schemes which realise a value in the future with no further input from the earning spouse and those which require further endeavour after the marriage is over to realise their maximum potential.

This will affect how the income derived from such sources will be treated in a divorce settlement.

The timing of payments will also be a consideration.  A performance bonus might be shared if it is awarded close in time to the end of the marriage, however, it is less likely to be shared if awarded well after the relationship is over.

As a general rule, it is possible to share in the benefits of such schemes even following divorce, however, consideration will be given to the value or opportunity which arose during the marriage against any extra input required by the earning individual to realise an enhanced value at a later date and whether this can be justified by reference to needs.

Future maintenance provisions

It is not always the case that in divorce, one party must pay the other an amount out of their income in the future. There has been a general movement away from maintenance being “for life,” with courts preferring to award maintenance as a shorter-term stepping stone to help the non-earning spouse transition into financial independence. In some circumstances, long-term maintenance can be required as part of a fair outcome in a divorce.

There are two classes of maintenance – child maintenance and spousal maintenance.  The two combined are often referred to as global maintenance. Where spousal maintenance features, a settlement or court order tends to be based on two principles:

  • what each party might need to live on in the future;
  • whether it is appropriate for each party to share in future financial resources.

It should be stated that future earnings or earning capacity, whilst relevant, is unlikely to be considered a matrimonial asset to be shared and so ongoing maintenance must be linked to a demonstrable income ‘need’ rather than a sense of entitlement or sharing.

Complex arrangements require specialist advice

The issue of the future value of income in divorce proceedings is complicated for both the earning and non-earning spouses, and specialist advice should be sought as soon as possible.

At Tees, our expert legal advisers work to ensure a fair financial settlement so that future needs can be met according to the financial resources available. We also work closely with financial advisers in our Wealth Management team where needed. They will ensure that any future financial planning considerations are taken into account so you both have a clear view of your financial future.

Tees secures £140,000 settlement for family after fatal DVT

Tees secures £140,000 settlement for family after fatal DVT and Pulmonary Embolism due to medical negligence

Janine Collier recently represented a family in a successful medical negligence case, securing a £140,000 settlement after the tragic loss of a 63-year-old woman, F. The case arose from a failure to provide appropriate preventative treatment for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) following routine knee surgery, which led to a fatal pulmonary embolism.

Background: A preventable tragedy

F was an active, sporty woman who underwent knee surgery in January 2010 to treat a medial meniscal tear. Despite a known history of bilateral blood clots and varicose vein surgery, F did not receive appropriate DVT prophylaxis. Her surgery was performed as a day case at Scarborough Hospital, and she was discharged with painkillers and a follow-up appointment scheduled six weeks later.

In the days following her surgery, F experienced significant discomfort, swelling in her leg and ankle, and difficulty straightening her leg. On January 23rd, 2010, just 11 days post-surgery, her condition deteriorated rapidly. Despite her husband’s efforts and an emergency call for an ambulance, F passed away in his arms. The post-mortem report confirmed the cause of death as a pulmonary embolism resulting from DVT in her right leg.

Legal claim and allegations

The claim alleged that the medical team failed to properly assess F’s risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and did not take appropriate preventative measures, including the use of mechanical (e.g., compression stockings) or chemical prophylaxis, such as low molecular weight Heparin. Expert opinion concluded that had these measures been taken, F’s death would have been preventable.

While the Defendant did not admit liability, they expressed a willingness to explore a settlement.

Settlement breakdown

The family’s claim included compensation for F’s pain and suffering, as well as dependency claims for her husband and three adult children, who suffered financial losses due to her death. Notably, one of F’s daughters faced significant financial hardship, as F had provided regular childcare for her grandchildren. After her mother’s passing, she had to reduce her working hours and arrange private childcare.

The final settlement amounted to £140,000, distributed as follows:

  • F’s Estate (Pain and Suffering): £2,000
  • F’s Husband: £103,250
  • F’s Son: £2,500
  • First Daughter: £1,250
  • Second Daughter: £31,000

Supporting the family beyond the settlement

Following the settlement, Tees’ Wealth Management team provided tailored financial advice to F’s husband and second daughter, ensuring their compensation would be effectively managed to support their future needs.

Get expert advice on medical negligence claims

If you have concerns about medical negligence or the care provided to you or a loved one, Tees offers free and confidential legal advice. Our experienced medical negligence solicitors are dedicated to helping families secure the compensation they deserve.

Contact us today for a consultation.

Spina Bifida ante natal screening claim Bedfordshire Hospital NHS Trust

The medical negligence case of Deborah Mackay recently made headline news. Here, we discuss what we hope to achieve for Deborah in the ongoing negotiations.

Background of the case

Deborah Mackay approached Tees Law at the age of 25 following the birth of her son, Calum Mackay. Calum was born with severe spina bifida, hydrocephalus, fetal valproate syndrome, and talipes. Due to these conditions, he was severely developmentally delayed, had profound learning difficulties, and suffered from seizures.

It was unlikely that Calum would ever have been able to receive a mainstream education or obtain future employment. Experts agreed that he would be permanently dependent on a wheelchair and require 24-hour care, as well as specially adapted accommodation. However, his life expectancy was close to normal.

Despite these challenges, Deborah was a devoted mother who did everything possible to care for Calum.

Admission of negligence

Bedfordshire Hospital NHS Trust admitted that Calum’s spina bifida could and should have been identified during antenatal ultrasound scans. The hospital also accepted that had the diagnosis been made at that time, Mrs. Mackay would have been offered – and would have chosen – to terminate the pregnancy.

Legal proceedings and interim payments

Tees Law argued that the Defendant should be responsible for the additional costs associated with raising Calum due to all his disabilities. A full trial was scheduled for 2013, with the expectation of securing several million pounds in compensation.

Between 2009 and 2011, we secured interim payments totaling approximately £705,000 for Deborah. She invested £450,000 in a property in Clapham, Bedfordshire, which was adapted for Calum’s needs. The remaining funds allowed her to establish a care regime and purchase essential aids and appliances.

Calum’s unexpected passing and the financial repercussions

Tragically, in November 2011, Calum unexpectedly passed away at the age of six. Following his death, the claim was finally valued in July 2012 at £330,000. This meant that Mrs. Mackay was required to repay £375,000 within a year—a deadline set by Bedfordshire Hospital NHS Trust.

Ongoing negotiations to protect Deborah’s home

We are currently negotiating with the legal representatives of Bedford NHS Trust to ensure the best possible outcome for Deborah. While she accepts that the money must be repaid, the immediate threat of losing her home remains a pressing concern. Our primary goal is to alleviate this pressure.

The defendant has now agreed, in recent days, to take no further steps to enforce the sale of the property until at least October of this year. Additionally, we are working to ensure that the property is sold at a fair market value, rather than at a reduced price to merely satisfy the amount due to the Trust.

Legal and ethical considerations

Deborah’s lawyer commented:

“The situation Deborah is in is highly unusual. The Defendant is entitled to seek reimbursement, and Deborah acknowledges this. However, the hospital trust had initially expected to pay out several million pounds in compensation due to its negligence. Because of Calum’s tragic death, their liability has been significantly reduced. In a way, Calum’s passing has resulted in a financial windfall for the Trust.

One would hope that the Trust will now approach this matter with extreme sensitivity, given that we are dealing with a vulnerable individual facing immense hardship. Our aim is to ensure that Deborah is not left homeless as a result of repaying her liability to the NHS Trust.”

Mrs. Mackay expressed her appreciation, stating:

“Tees could not have done more. The firm gave honest, professional advice, which I felt able to accept. I am very happy with how Tees dealt with all issues.”

Free, confidential advice on medical negligence

If you have been affected by medical negligence, Tees Law offers free, confidential advice to help you understand your legal options.

Tees settles misdiagnosis claim for £13,000

A misdiagnosis settlement involving a missed heart block diagnosis and its repercussions for patient safety.

Patient admission and diagnosis

An elderly man was admitted to hospital suffering from chest pains and dizziness. An ECG was performed, and the assessing doctor, who was in a junior position, diagnosed partial heart block. A suitable treatment plan was implemented based on this diagnosis.

Misdiagnosis and consequences

Unfortunately, the junior doctor’s interpretation of the patient’s ECG was incorrect. The patient’s heart had, in fact, been in total heart block, meaning it was not beating in the correct way. The appropriate treatment in this case would have been the insertion of a pacemaker.

Missed opportunities and patient deterioration

Despite the patient’s worsening condition, several opportunities for more senior doctors to intervene were missed. Three days after his admission, the patient suffered a cardiac arrest and died.

Hospital admission of error

Following an internal review, the hospital admitted that the patient’s treatment had been incorrect. They acknowledged that had his condition been diagnosed correctly, he would have survived.

Legal outcome

Tees law successfully pursued a claim on behalf of the patient’s estate. Liability was admitted, and our medical negligence solicitor Sarah Stocker recovered £13,000 in compensation.

Contact Us

For free, confidential advice on medical negligence, please get in touch with our experienced legal team.

Tees settles three birth injury cases, winning £400k for clients

In the last twelve months, Janine Collier, Partner at Tees in Cambridge has settled three medical negligence cases concerning a failure to identify and repair perineal tears resulting in injuries to the anal sphincter complex following childbirth.

What is a perineal tear?

It is not uncommon to sustain a tear between the vagina and the anus during childbirth. First degree tears are so small and superficial (involving just the skin and the tissue surrounding the vagina) that few, if any, stitches are required. Sometimes, the tear extends further, into the muscles beneath the skin (a second degree tear) and this will need to be stitched and closed layer by layer.  Around 4% of women suffer a more serious tear which extends to or through the rectum (third and fourth degree tears).

Why should perineal tears be repaired at the time of delivery?

Healthcare professionals generally accept that tears are most important to be identified and repaired at the time of delivery to reduce the risk of infection, recto-vaginal fistulae and various rectal symptomology, including faecal and flatus incontinence.

Obstetricians now undergo a rigorous training programme to minimise the chances of clinicians missing these tears after delivery; to ensure a good quality repair; and to maximise the chances of good continence following primary repair.

What are the consequences of missing a third or fourth degree tear at delivery?

Unfortunately, however, sometimes, these tears are still missed and notwithstanding a delayed repair (sometimes primary, sometimes secondary), the women suffer persistent and debilitating rectal symptomology which may include incontinence of flatus, faecal incontinence, passive soiling etc.  Understandably, this has a significant effect on their lifestyle, their relationships with friends, family and Partners and, in some cases, their ability to work.

These women may be entitled to compensation to help them adapt to their situation; to fund future treatment; and to compensate them for any financial losses arising from their injuries.

How can we help you?

If you suffered a third or fourth degree tear; if this was not identified and repaired at the time of delivery; and if you suffer continuing problems as a consequence, please contact our Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury expert, Janine Collier, for some initial advice. Janine is an expert in this field of medical negligence law. For an initial chat, you can call Janine on 01223 702303 or email janine.collier@teeslaw.com

Tees is proud to support The MASIC Foundation – a charity formed to support mothers with 3rd and 4th degree tears. Visit their website to find resources for support.

Free, confidential advice on medical negligence

Using Collaboration to achieve a ‘clean-break’ divorce

Collaboration is a route to resolution which, in the right circumstances, can help couples find an amicable solution when a relationship breaks down.

Background

Sue and James had been married for 23 years and have a 22 year old daughter and a 20 year old son.

For several years prior to instructing solicitors they had not been getting along and been living more and more separate lives under the same roof. They decided to separate and sell their jointly owned house which was too large for either of them with a view to going their separate ways.

Problems Faced

The overall assets, including pensions and James’ company interests totalled approximately £2 million. Sue had worked part-time during the marriage in an administrative position but had no recent skills.

Our Solution

Sue also went to see a collaborative lawyer and both were assessed as being suitable to be accepted as collaborative clients. They held a good deal of mutual respect for one another despite no longer wishing to remain together. Neither had an ‘axe to grind’ but they needed clarity and legal guidance and advice due to the complexity of the situation.

Over a series of 6 meetings (4-way meetings), we assisted Sue and James identify their assets and financial circumstances and needs. This included:

  • An independent company valuation was obtained early on through agreement and an expert jointly appointed
  • A full report as to pension sharing and how equality of income might be achieved
  • Looking at monthly budgets and needs
  • Looking at James’ and Sue’s housing requirements

Outcome

To conclude, a mutually agreed settlement was arrived at which took into account James’ wish to maintain autonomy over the significant company assets without claim from Sue. Sue took a higher amount from the non-company assets (house and savings) to provide her with enough to buy a new home with a fund sufficient to enable the clean-break on income which both wanted.

Sue and James agreed a ‘pension sharing order’ which was based on both having broadly similar income at retirement.

During the process, the ‘reason’ for the divorce was also agreed within the face to face sessions and papers drafted in between sessions. The two collaborative lawyers were also mindful throughout as to the potential need for counselling and this was discussed with Sue and James, who separately agreed this may assist them. By adopting this approach, it assisted them to stay focussed on the issues and facts, rather than the meetings becoming emotionally too charged.

If you want a lawyer to take a closer look at your situation, our family and divorce lawyers are based in: