Child arrangement order Archives

Grandparents’ rights to see grandchildren

Posted on 1 August 202422 March 2025 by Sarah O'Sullivan

One of the common misconceptions surrounding family law is that grandparents have an inherent or automatic right to see or spend time with their grandchildren – in other words, have grandparents’ rights. There is nothing enshrined in law to grant grandparents automatic rights based on their biological connection alone. However, the happy fact is that a court would rarely deny grandparents access to their grandchildren unless there is a specific reason to do so.

Here, we outline the different legal avenues open to grandparents to get access to their grandchildren:

Child Arrangements Order to spend time with your grandchildren

If, for any reason, a person with parental responsibility were to object to or try to prevent you from seeing your grandchild, and you cannot reach an agreement with them, you will need to apply to the court for a court order.

Because there is no automatic legal right to contact grandparents, the Child Arrangements Order would be the document that enshrines your legal rights and responsibilities as a grandparent. The court application is a two-step process:

apply for permission to apply for a Child Arrangements Order
apply for a Child Arrangements Order.

What is a Child Arrangements Order?

A Child Arrangements Order (CAO) is an order regulating arrangements relating to either of the following:

with whom a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact, and
when a child is to live, spend time or otherwise have contact with any person.

Getting permission to apply for a Child Arrangements Order

The court will consider a number of factors before granting you permission to apply for a CAO, as follows:

your history of contact with your grandchild
what you are seeking by way of contact – times, locations, etc and
whether what you are seeking would be beneficial for your grandchild.

Applying for a Child Arrangements Order

The court recognises the value and importance of a child spending time with their grandparents. The court has to balance this with the wishes of the children and the wishes of the parents (which are not necessarily the same), and each case has its own unique facts. These situations can be fraught with difficulty and should be carefully navigated. A skilled family lawyer may be able to guide you to mediation services to help prevent hostilities from escalating and the involvement of the courts.

The court has several principles that it considers before making a CAO. However, the paramount consideration is always the welfare of the child. For example, the court will consider:

the existing arrangements that you have in place and that the parents have in place
whether the arrangements you seek would take away time from the parents in such a way that it would not be in the child’s best interests.

What is the ‘no order’ principle?

Another key principle is the ‘no order’ principle, whereby the court will not make an order if they do not think the order would further the welfare of that child.

An example of where a CAO might not be given (or perhaps not in the terms requested) would be where there was a history or allegations of domestic abuse surrounding the grandparent. If there were allegations of this nature, the court would determine on a balance of probabilities whether these allegations were true at a fact-finding hearing and then consider whether they should make a CAO and on what terms. Even in such circumstances, the court may still determine that the children can spend time with their grandparents, but only in such a way as to protect that child’s welfare (perhaps through contact taking place remotely or being supervised).

It would only be in extreme circumstances where the court would determine that no contact should be allowed with a grandparent.

What if a parent objects to a grandparent seeing their grandchild?

If a parent objects, they may raise their reasons with the court. The court will then consider what information they require to decide on the best arrangements for the child.

What if I have a Child Arrangements Order in place, but the parents are preventing me from seeing my grandchildren?

This is an upsetting and frustrating situation that, unfortunately, many people find themselves in. The court will consider why this has happened and what can be done to facilitate the arrangements without difficulty in the future.

The court has in place several mechanisms which it can apply to the parent to enforce your CAO, including:

parenting courses
compensation to be paid (e.g. you had travel tickets that were not used because contact was prevented)
compulsory unpaid work (otherwise known as community service)
a fine
imprisonment – this is an extreme enforcement mechanism, and one the court is unlikely to use, as it would result in depriving the children of their parents. However, if they continue to breach a CAO (which by its nature is in place because it supports the wellbeing of that child), then they risk harming their children’s welfare. Therefore, repeated breaches without reasonable excuse might sometimes result in imprisonment.

In the first instance, the court will look at trying to resolve the issues rather than move to enforcement.

Special guardianship order

This is usually intended for situations when the children cannot live with their birth parents and require secure accommodation. Often the court will look to blood relatives in such a situation and this includes grandparents. A Special Guardianship Order confers parental responsibility for the child subject to the application to the applicant, for example to the grandparent.

The SGO, therefore, allows the special guardian to make day-to-day arrangements for the child and decisions about the child’s upbringing, such as schooling.

To apply for a Special Guardianship Order, as a grandparent, you need to have one of the following:

have in place a CAO
have lived with the child for 3 out of the last 5 years, or because you are a relative of the child, have had the child live with you for the year immediately before application
have consent of the local authority (if the child is in care)
have consent of those with parental responsibility (usually the birth parents but also anyone else with a CAO)
have permission of the court.

Unlike adoption (see below), a Special Guardianship Order does not cut the legal tie of automatic parental responsibility between a child and their birth parents. However, the parental responsibility of the special guardian can be exercised to the exclusion of others with parental responsibility, effectively overriding the parental responsibility of the birth parents. However, there are limits to an SGO which are:

you cannot change the child’s surname or
remove them from the jurisdiction (of England and Wales) for three months or more without the consent of all those with parental responsibility.

Adoption of grandchildren by grandparents

Adoption is a draconian but sometimes necessary measure that will completely sever the legal link between a child and their parents. If the child is not in care and both of their parents are alive, an adoption order will rarely be appropriate. However, it can happen, and an example of where adoption by a grandparent might be appropriate would be where a single mother decides that she does not want to raise her child.

Parents can consent to their child being adopted or generally placed for adoption. The child will need to be six weeks old or older for parents to give such consent. If a child is placed into adoption, the courts will prefer adoption by a blood relative over a stranger.

However, every situation is different, and the starting point is taking specialist legal advice. At Tees, we are here to help you navigate your options and decide which avenue is right for you.

What is a child arrangements order during divorce or separation?

Posted on 2 December 202123 March 2025 by Sarah O'Sullivan

A child arrangements order is a legal document that formalises childcare agreements between parents who are going through a divorce or separation. It determines critical aspects such as where the children will live and how much time they will spend with each parent.

This type of court order is typically necessary when parents cannot reach a mutual agreement on childcare arrangements. Ideally, parents should try to resolve these issues amicably, often with the assistance of a mediator. However, if disputes remain unresolved, applying for a Child Arrangements Order through the court may be the best option.

Why might you need a child arrangements order?

You may require a Child Arrangements Order if:

You are unable to agree on custody or visitation arrangements.
One parent is not adhering to a previously agreed-upon schedule.
There are concerns about a parent neglecting their responsibilities.
Mediation has failed to resolve disagreements.

If both parents are cooperating and the existing arrangements are working, a court order is typically unnecessary.

How to apply for a child arrangements order

Attempt mediation first:
- Before applying for a child arrangements order, you are legally required to attend a Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAM) unless there are valid reasons not to do so, such as instances of domestic abuse.
Seek legal advice:
- A solicitor can guide you through the process, helping you prepare your application and submit it to the court.
Attend court hearings:
- Both parents will need to attend a court hearing, where a judge or magistrate will assess the situation.
- A representative from the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) may also provide input by producing a safeguarding report and making recommendations.
Decision making:
- The court will prioritise the child’s welfare, considering factors like their wishes, feelings, and overall needs.
- If an agreement cannot be reached during the initial hearing, further evidence may be required before a final decision is made.

Specific issue orders and prohibited steps orders

In addition to Child Arrangements Orders, the court may issue:

Specific issue orders: For resolving specific disputes, such as which school a child should attend or whether they should follow a particular religion.
Prohibited steps orders: To prevent a parent from taking certain actions, like relocating a child abroad without consent.

Child arrangements orders vs. special guardianship orders

A Special Guardianship Order (SGO) grants parental responsibility to someone other than the child’s parents, often in cases where parents are unable to provide proper care. Unlike a Child Arrangements Order, an SGO allows the guardian to make decisions without requiring parental approval, although some significant decisions still require consent.

Can grandparents apply for a child arrangements order?

Yes, grandparents or other relatives can apply for a Child Arrangements Order, although they need the court’s permission first. This may be relevant if they have been acting as the child’s primary caregivers or if they wish to establish visitation rights.

How to change a child arrangements order

While Child Arrangements Orders are intended to provide long-term stability, circumstances can change. If significant changes occur, such as a parent relocating, remarrying, or experiencing financial difficulties, you can apply to modify the order. The court will reassess the child’s best interests before making any adjustments.

Expert legal support for child arrangements orders

Navigating the complexities of child custody during a separation can be challenging. Seeking the advice of our specialist family law solicitor can ensure that your child’s best interests remain the priority. Professional legal support can help formalise arrangements and provide clarity and reassurance during this difficult time.

For further guidance on child arrangements orders, contact our experienced family law team today.

Resolving high-income divorce challenges and future income concerns

Posted on 13 August 202023 March 2025 by Sarah O'Sullivan

The division of assets is one of the main issues to resolve during divorce proceedings. For people with very high incomes and substantial assets, and their spouses, being able to reach a fair financial settlement is, understandably, a key concern, given the number of potentially complicating factors and levels of income that need to be taken into account.

Decisions as to what happens to future income is often where there is most difficulty in reaching an agreement in a divorce settlement involving a high-earning spouse. This is particularly so where complex reward structures are involved that are not fully understood by one if not both spouses.

Failure to fully take into account incentive and performance reward packages can have significant implications on the outcome of a divorce settlement and risk restricting either party’s choices in the future, so you must seek specialist legal advice.

Incentive payments and performance payments not yet realised

There may be circumstances where there are financial resources in place through incentive and performance reward packages which originated during the marriage, although they are not immediately available at the time of the divorce settlement.

Such financial resources may well be shared in a divorce to achieve fairness between the earning and non-earning spouse.

Incentive and performance reward packages are aimed at attracting and retaining the best talent and are likely to be nuanced from firm to firm and industry to industry. However, enhanced remuneration structures do tend to follow certain themes, such as:

Share options (or stock options)

Share option schemes are typically used as an incentive for employees. A share option is the right to buy a certain number of company shares at a fixed price at some point in the future. Share option schemes often come with tax incentives.

There are different share option schemes you may come across such as Company Share Option Plans, Enterprise Management Incentives, Nil-Cost and Nominal Costs Options, Share (Stock) Appreciation Rights, Sharesave Share Option Schemes and ‘Phantom’ Options.

Long-term incentive plans

A long-term incentive plan (LTIP) is a term that is commonly used among listed companies to describe executive share plans under which a company makes share-based awards to senior employees with a vesting period of at least three years. Such structures are also often called ‘performance shares’ or, in the US, ‘restricted stock units’.

Again there are often tax efficiencies to these schemes. LTIPs are not restricted to rewards in shares; cash also features in these reward structures.

Management incentive plans

A management incentive plan (MIP) most often refers to a scheme where the equity is allocated to senior management in a privately owned business. The company is likely to be owned by a private equity house and the equity would vest with the senior management in the event the private equity house sells its share the business or the company is floated on the stock market.

Performance bonuses

A form of additional compensation paid to an employee or department as a reward for achieving specific goals or hitting predetermined targets. A performance bonus is compensation beyond normal wages and is typically awarded after a performance appraisal and analysis of projects completed and/or financial targets met by the employee over a specific period.

Sharing of payments – what to consider?

There is a distinction to be made between those sums payable under such incentive or performance schemes which realise a value in the future with no further input from the earning spouse and those which require further endeavour after the marriage is over to realise their maximum potential.

This will affect how the income derived from such sources will be treated in a divorce settlement.

The timing of payments will also be a consideration. A performance bonus might be shared if it is awarded close in time to the end of the marriage, however, it is less likely to be shared if awarded well after the relationship is over.

As a general rule, it is possible to share in the benefits of such schemes even following divorce, however, consideration will be given to the value or opportunity which arose during the marriage against any extra input required by the earning individual to realise an enhanced value at a later date and whether this can be justified by reference to needs.

Future maintenance provisions

It is not always the case that in divorce, one party must pay the other an amount out of their income in the future. There has been a general movement away from maintenance being “for life,” with courts preferring to award maintenance as a shorter-term stepping stone to help the non-earning spouse transition into financial independence. In some circumstances, long-term maintenance can be required as part of a fair outcome in a divorce.

There are two classes of maintenance – child maintenance and spousal maintenance. The two combined are often referred to as global maintenance. Where spousal maintenance features, a settlement or court order tends to be based on two principles:

what each party might need to live on in the future;
whether it is appropriate for each party to share in future financial resources.

It should be stated that future earnings or earning capacity, whilst relevant, is unlikely to be considered a matrimonial asset to be shared and so ongoing maintenance must be linked to a demonstrable income ‘need’ rather than a sense of entitlement or sharing.

Complex arrangements require specialist advice

The issue of the future value of income in divorce proceedings is complicated for both the earning and non-earning spouses, and specialist advice should be sought as soon as possible.

At Tees, our expert legal advisers work to ensure a fair financial settlement so that future needs can be met according to the financial resources available. We also work closely with financial advisers in our Wealth Management team where needed. They will ensure that any future financial planning considerations are taken into account so you both have a clear view of your financial future.