Navigating surrogacy: Current laws, challenges, and future reforms

What are the current laws governing surrogacy in the UK?

In the UK, surrogacy is primarily governed by the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985 and certain provisions within the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. Under these laws, the surrogate mother is legally considered the child’s parent at birth. Legal parenthood can then be transferred through a Parental Order or Adoption after the child’s birth, typically taking anywhere from six months to a year. This process may take longer if the Court’s schedule is full.

To apply for a Parental Order, you or your partner must be genetically related to the child, the child must live with you, and you must permanently reside in the UK, Channel Islands, or the Isle of Man. If there is a dispute over who should be the child’s legal parents, the court will decide based on the best interests of the child. While surrogacy agreements can be made between the intended parents and the surrogate prior to birth, they are not legally enforceable in the UK, even if the intended parents and surrogate have signed an agreement and the intended parents have covered the surrogate’s expenses. It is also illegal for solicitors to advise on such agreements.

What Problems Does the Current Surrogacy Law Cause?

The current surrogacy laws in the UK are outdated. Most of these laws were established over 30 years ago, and have not kept up with changes in society and advancements in fertility treatments. These outdated laws do not fully support the diverse family structures that exist today, including same-sex couples, single parents, and blended families.

One of the main issues with the current system is the lengthy process to establish legal parenthood after the child is born. Since the surrogate mother is considered the legal parent, intended parents must wait until a Parental Order is granted, which can take months to a year. During this waiting period, intended parents have limited legal rights over the child, and in some cases, a surrogate could even decide to keep the child. This creates vulnerability for both the intended parents and surrogates and raises concerns about the best interests of the child.

What Does the New Surrogacy Bill Propose?

The Law Commission of England and Wales, in collaboration with the Scottish Law Commission, has proposed a new framework to modernize surrogacy laws. This proposal aims to better protect children, surrogates, and intended parents. Key features of the proposed reforms include:

  • Immediate parental rights for intended parents from the moment of birth, eliminating the need to wait for a Parental Order.

  • Introduction of safeguards and screening processes, including criminal and medical background checks, and independent legal advice and counseling.

  • Regulation of surrogacy arrangements by Regulated Surrogacy Organisations (RSOs), which would be monitored by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).

  • Reform of parental orders to allow courts to make decisions even if the surrogate does not consent, provided it is in the child’s best interest.

  • Enhanced rights for children born via surrogacy, better employment rights for intended parents, and more comprehensive guidance on nationality and immigration matters.

These reforms aim to ensure legal, physical, and emotional protection for all parties involved, bringing surrogacy laws in line with other areas of family law.

What Are the Prospects for Government Action on Surrogacy Law Reforms?

The final report and draft legislation were published on 29 March 2023. The Government is currently reviewing the report’s recommendations, but no formal action has been taken yet. Due to limited parliamentary time, changes are unlikely to be implemented immediately. However, surrogacy law reform is likely to become a priority for the new government in the future.

By modernizing surrogacy laws, the UK could create a more inclusive, supportive, and legally sound framework for all parties involved in surrogacy arrangements.

Caroline Andrews reflects after speaking at AEPOCS conference

Caroline Andrews, a Fertility Law Solicitor, was invited by the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society (AEPCOS) to speak on behalf of Verity, a national charity for PCOS, at their annual conference in California, USA. She attended in her role as a volunteer trustee.

At the conference, Caroline emphasised the importance of providing comprehensive support to patients with fertility-affecting conditions. Beyond medical interventions, she highlighted the need for emotional and legal support in an increasingly complex world.

Reflecting on her experience, Caroline noted the stark differences between Fertility Law in the USA and in England and Wales. She shared her insights on fertility treatment and surrogacy practices across these jurisdictions.

Caroline’s perspective on fertility law differences

“It was fascinating to observe how fertility treatment and surrogacy laws differ in the USA compared to here.

In some US states, anti-abortion laws have led to embryos being granted ‘personhood rights.’ This legal shift has significant implications for IVF procedures. In contrast, England and Wales are governed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which provides clear regulations on the storage and use of embryos. Hearing firsthand from American women about the impact of Roe v Wade’s repeal was deeply moving.

In July this year, an amendment to the HFEA Act 2008 extended the storage period for embryos, sperm, and eggs to 55 years, subject to the consent of both parties every ten years. Cases in England have debated what constitutes valid consent, particularly when one party passes away. A notable contrast is the USA, where legal disputes like the high-profile case of Sofia Vergara and her ex-partner have brought these issues to light. With more people considering the freezing of eggs, sperm, or embryos, understanding both the medical and legal implications is essential.

Some US states have introduced laws requiring medical insurance to cover certain fertility treatments, helping mitigate the significant costs involved. Meanwhile, in England, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) released a report in September 2022, highlighting compliance issues in fertility clinics and concerns about unexpected additional costs. This report is a valuable resource for anyone considering fertility treatment.

Surrogacy law: An international perspective

Regarding surrogacy, the legal framework in England and Wales is often viewed as outdated. The surrogate remains the legal parent until a parental order is granted post-birth. Although the Law Commission has proposed changes to modernise surrogacy law, implementation remains a distant prospect. As a result, some individuals pursue international surrogacy, but they must be cautious about the varying legal restrictions across US states and in England.

A final thought

As a patient representative in my spare time, I’m acutely aware of the emotional, physical, and financial toll of fertility treatment. However, as a family lawyer, I believe it’s equally important for people to consider the legal implications of their choices. How these laws will evolve remains to be seen.”

Stay tuned for a video link to Caroline’s full presentation.