Comprehending environmental offences within the United Kingdom

Written by Jamie Hare on 22nd February 2024 | 9 minute read

Environmental offences in the United Kingdom refer to infringements of statutes and regulations devised to safeguard the environment and endorse sustainable actions. Grasping the concept and categories of environmental offences, their repercussions on society, and the legal structure encompassing them, is imperative for fostering consciousness and advocating responsible conduct.

Types of environmental offences

Environmental offences encapsulate a range of activities detrimental to the environment, such as pollution, unlawful waste disposal, deforestation, and wildlife trafficking. These offences can trigger extensive repercussions, including damage to ecosystems, loss of biodiversity, and adverse health impacts on both humans and wildlife.

Regulation of environmental offences

In the United Kingdom, environmental offences are regulated by a sturdy legal framework that strives to avert, detect, and prosecute individuals and corporations involved in harmful practices. Noteworthy legislation includes the Environmental Protection Act 1990, the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, and the Control of Pollution (Amendment) Act 1989.

This legal framework equips authorities with the necessary means to probe into and act against those accountable for environmental offences. Penalties for such offences can range from fines and seizure of assets to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the violation.

By spreading awareness about environmental offences, their impact, and the legal consequences, we can motivate individuals and businesses to adopt more sustainable practices and contribute to the protection and preservation of our environment.

Implementation and Penalties for Environmental Offences

The execution of environmental offences is primarily accomplished by the Environment Agency, which holds a pivotal role in overseeing and regulating activities that could harm the environment. As the key environmental regulator, the Environment Agency possesses the authority to investigate, enforce, and prosecute those who commit environmental offences.

When enforcing environmental laws, the Environment Agency has the power to impose various sanctions and penalties. These measures are designed to hold offenders accountable for their actions and deter future violations. Common sanctions for environmental offences can include fines, civil sanctions, enforcement undertakings, and even imprisonment in severe cases.

The process of enforcement and deciding on environmental offences involves several stages. Initially, the Environment Agency gathers evidence through inspections, monitoring, and investigations. Once sufficient evidence is obtained, a decision is made on whether to pursue enforcement action. This decision is based on factors such as the severity of the offence, the potential harm caused, and the compliance history of the offender.

If enforcement action is taken, the Environment Agency may issue warnings, cautions, or formal notices to the offender. In more serious cases, prosecution may be pursued, leading to court proceedings and potential sanctions. Throughout the enforcement process, the Environment Agency aims to achieve compliance, restore any damage caused to the environment, and prevent further harm.

Call our specialist solicitors on 0808 231 1320

Increased awareness of environmental protection in recent years has increased the focus on enforcement action for breaches of environmental law.

A criminal prosecution is usually the most serious sanction that a regulator can use for an environmental offence. It can give the courts considerable scope to punish offenders and to deter others, including by use of imprisonment and unlimited fines.

Directors should know environmental liability can be both civil and criminal sanctions. In terms of criminal breaches, liability can be attached both to a corporate entity and individual directors or other officers of the organisation; if the corporate offence were committed with the consent or connivance, or attributable to the neglect of the director or officer.

Who prosecutes?

The principal environmental regulators are the Environment Agency (EA), Local Authorities and the Health and Safety Executive.

Other bodies that can become involved in the prosecution of wildlife and habitat offences are Natural England, The Marine Management Organisation and the Crown Prosecution Service.

The regulator is usually both the investigator and the prosecutor. A prosecution can have several negative effects on a business, including criminal penalties, including the imprisonment of company directors, unlimited fines, remediation costs and reputational damage through poor publicity. There can also be commercial damage and restrictions imposed on licenses or permits.

Alternatives to prosecution

As an alternative to prosecution, the EA may be able to impose a civil sanction. To impose civil sanction under the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008, the criminal standard of proof applies, so the EA must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that an offence has been committed.

The types of civil sanctions that may be applied are fixed or variable monetary penalties or various types of notices. The notices can include compliance, restoration or stop notices.

The EA publishes a full list of every breach and offence regulated by the EA and the enforcement action available in respect of each offence.

The EA may administer a formal caution as a deterrent in the circumstances that it could bring a prosecution if the offender admits the offence and consents to be cautioned. The EA must keep a record of the formal caution and it will be produced in court if the offender is later found guilty of a further offence. Where an offender refuses to accept the formal caution, the EA will generally prosecute for the original offence.

Examples of environmental offences in the UK

There have been several consequential cases of environmental offences in the United Kingdom that have had a profound impact on the environment and society at large. These cases serve as significant examples of the consequences of violating environmental regulations and the measures taken to prevent such offences.

A remarkable case is the Thames Water pollution incident in 2016. The company was found guilty of discharging approximately 1.4 billion litres of untreated sewage into the River Thames, causing severe harm to aquatic life and the overall ecosystem. Consequently, Thames Water was subject to a record-breaking fine of £20 million, sending a strong message that environmental offences will not be tolerated.

Another significant case is the Volkswagen emissions scandal in 2015, where the car manufacturer was found to have manipulated vehicle emissions tests. This deception resulted in increased air pollution and health risks for the public. The outcome of the case included substantial fines and compensation claims, as well as a damaged reputation for Volkswagen.

These cases underline the importance of holding individuals and organizations accountable for their actions regarding environmental protection. The impact of these offences extends beyond immediate environmental damage, affecting public health, wildlife, and the overall sustainability of our planet.

Lessons have been learned from these incidents, leading to stricter regulations and increased vigilance in environmental monitoring. The enforcement of these regulations plays a vital role in preventing future offences and safeguarding the environment. Businesses and individuals need to understand their legal obligations and take proactive measures to ensure compliance.